If you're new here, that title probably pulled you in. And you can thank the power of words for that. It's the exact same power the media uses to shape how we see animals; often unfairly.
Before we dive in, I want you to do something. Take a moment and picture two very different lost pets: a fluffy labradoodle and a pet python. Now, imagine the headlines for each.
Feel that shift? The immediate, gut-level reaction? That’s what we’re talking about. This isn't just about clickbait; it's about a deep-seated bias that has real consequences for animal welfare and the families who love them.
What if I told you this isn't just a feeling, but a documented phenomenon proven by scientific research? A study from Liverpool John Moores University has quantified this exact bias, revealing how the words chosen by media outlets systematically demonize reptile pets, impacting their safety, their chance of adoption, and even the laws that govern their keeping. This is the story of that research, its real-world impact, and how we can all become advocates for change.
The Study That Named the Unspoken Bias
In 2025, a team of zoologists at Liverpool John Moores University, led by Dr. John Bielby, embarked on a mission to analyze how the media talks about our pets. Their findings, which should be a wake-up call for every reptile owner and animal lover, were stark.
"We looked at newspaper articles over the last 20 years and the structure and the language used... What we found is that snakes or lizards get really different treatment than cats, dogs, and small furry animals." - Dr. John Bielby
The research methodology was rigorous. The team analyzed hundreds of media pieces from national newspapers to local social media posts covering stories of lost, abandoned, or rescued animals. They categorized the animals and dissected the language using linguistic analysis software, measuring for emotionality, sentiment, and agency (whether the animal was portrayed as an active subject or a passive object).
The conclusion was undeniable: Reptiles and amphibians are systematically dehumanized in media coverage compared to their furry counterparts.
The Language Gap - A Side-by-Side Analysis of Dehumanization
Let’s break down the exact language disparities the study found. This isn't about perception; it's about provable patterns.
This language doesn't just report the news; it frames the entire narrative. It tells the reader how to feel before they’ve even processed the facts. A dog is a tragedy. A snake is a threat.
The Real-World Impact: When Words Have Teeth (and Fangs)
This biased language is not a harmless academic curiosity. It has dire, real-world consequences for reptile welfare.
1. Slower Rescue Responses and Lower Reunion Rates
When a post decries a"5ft monster snake on the loose," what is the public's likely response? Fear. They are more likely to call pest control or police with a "shoot on sight" mentality than they are to call a rescue for a "lost, likely scared, family pet." This drastically reduces the chance of a safe recovery. Rescuers often report arriving at a scene only to find a beloved pet already killed out of fear.
2. Increased Stigma and Legislative Bias
Sensationalized media coverage fuels public fear, which directly translates into discriminatory legislation. Bans on specific species or overly restrictive ordinances are often passed in a wave of panic following a sensationalized news story, not based on rational risk assessment or animal welfare science.
3. Barrier to Adoption and Sanctuary Overload
Dehumanizing language makes reptiles harder to adopt out. A profile describing a bearded dragon as "it needs a tank" attracts less interest than one saying "Sunny is a curious guy who loves watching TV and munching on blueberries. He's looking for a quiet home to call his own." This language crisis contributes to the overcrowding of reptile rescues and sanctuaries.
4. Erosion of Owner Empathy and Care Standards
If the wider culture constantly tells you that your pet is an unfeeling object, a "display animal," it can subconsciously lower the standard of care an owner is willing to provide. Why invest in veterinary care, enrichment, or large enclosures for an object? Respectful language is the foundation of ethical animal stewardship.
The Psychology of the Bias - Why We Fear Scales
This didn't happen in a vacuum. Our bias against reptiles, known as ophidiophobia (fear of snakes) and a general discomfort towards reptiles, is deeply embedded in human evolution. Primatologists note that an instinctive caution around snakes may have been evolutionarily advantageous for our ancestors.
However, a modern, ethical society is defined by moving beyond our basest instincts. We overcome primal fears with knowledge and empathy. The media's amplification of these ancient fears, instead of challenging them, is a failure of its duty to inform and educate. They are catering to the lizard brain, not speaking to the human heart.
How to Be a Language Warrior for Your Pet
This is where we turn outrage into action. Here is your actionable, step-by-step guide to combating this bias and changing the narrative.
Step 1: Audit and Amend Your Own Language Lead by example.This starts in your own home and social circles.
- Instead of: "My snake is feeding." → Say: "My snake is eating his dinner."
- Instead of: "I own a reptile." → Say: "I am a reptile guardian/caretaker," or "My reptile companion is..."
- Instead of: "It escaped." → Say: "He/she got out," or "We had an enclosure breach."
- ALWAYS use your pet's name.
Step 2: Craft the Perfect "Lost Pet" Post (Template Included)
Be proactive. If the worst happens, control the narrative immediately with a post designed to generate empathy, not fear.
Template: Headline: LOST FAMILY PET: [Pet's Name], our friendly [Species] Body: "Our beloved pet [Name], a [age, species, morph e.g., ‘3-year-old corn snake’] has gotten out of his enclosure. He is not dangerous or venomous. He is likely very scared and hiding. [Name] is not a threat to people or pets. He responds to [describe handling method, e.g., ‘being gently picked up’] and loves [favorite food, e.g., ‘his mouse dinners’]. We are heartbroken and miss him terribly. Please do not harm him. If you see him, please [call/email] immediately. Thank you for helping us bring our sweet boy/girl home." Include: Several clear, well-lit photos showing their personality and scale.
Step 3: Engage with Media Respectfully and Firmly When you see a biased article:
- Comment Publicly (Politely): "Thank you for covering this story. As a reptile owner, I'd like to gently point out that the phrase 'on the loose' creates unnecessary fear. This is a lost, likely terrified, family pet named Apollo, not a criminal. Using more accurate language could help him get home safely."
- Email the Editor/Journalist Directly: Provide a short, clear explanation of the bias and a link to the Liverpool study. Offer yourself as a local reptile expert for future stories.
Step 4: Empower Your Local Rescues and Journalists.
Share this article and the study with your local reptile rescues and animal welfare reporters. Arm them with the knowledge and the language to do better. Rescues can adopt these communication guidelines for their adoption profiles and press releases.
Step 5: Celebrate "Scale-Babies" Proudly on Social Media.
Flood the internet with positive content. Post pictures of your snake watching TV with you, your bearded dragon snuggled in a blanket, your turtle eagerly eating a strawberry. Use hashtags like #ScaleBaby #ReptileLove #NotAMonster #HerpKeepers to build a community and redefine the image of reptile ownership through thousands of positive examples.
Conclusion
The words we choose are a reflection of how we think, and they have the power to change how others think. The journey from "monster on the loose" to "beloved pet lost" is more than a semantic shift; it's a profound evolution in empathy.
It’s about recognizing that respect isn’t reserved for animals that are soft to the touch. It’s about acknowledging that a complex, fascinating inner life exists behind those unblinking eyes. It’s about demanding that our media, and ourselves, do better. For Apollo the boa, for every scaly, feathery, and furry friend, and for the families who love them, we can and must choose words that protect, that respect, and that love.
Our scale-babies aren’t monsters. They’re family. It’s time our language reflected that.
Comments
Post a Comment