Skip to main content

Alabama Mom Sues Starbucks For Allowing Dogs On Their Premises After Her 5-Year-Old Daughter Was Attacked

The mother of a 5-year-old girl that was bitten by a dog at one of Starbucks’s coffeehouses in Jefferson County has filed a lawsuit against the company.

Alabama Mom Sues Starbucks For Allowing Dogs On Their Premises After Her 5-Year-Old Daughter Was Attacked

Kourtney Tillman from Alabama, and her daughter were sitting on the patio of a Starbucks near Irondale May 2019 when the girl tried to pet another customer’s dog, according to the lawsuit.

Tillman alleges that her daughter suffered severe injuries, including cuts to her face and eyes, permanent nerve damage and permanent scars because of the dog bite.

The suit claims Starbucks is to blame because it chose to allow dogs on the premises, failed to require leashes and neglected to post any notice that dogs would be present at the store. It argues Starbucks knew of the “dangerous propensity” of allowing dogs in and around their stores.

A motion was filed by Starbucks to dismiss the lawsuit, alleging that it holds no responsibility for the injuries.

“Starbucks Corporation does not have a legal duty to defend its patrons from unexpected dog attacks,” Starbucks’ motion to dismiss the case says.

Additionally, Starbucks claims that Tillman and her daughter were acquainted with the dog owner, but they failed to name the owner in the suit.

“While Alabama law does not contemplate a scenario where a business owner can be held liable for the actions of a dog with which it is unfamiliar, the law does impose liability on the owners of dogs when they attack someone,” the Starbucks motion states.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Risks: Weighing Vaccine Side Effects vs. Deadly Diseases

Some dog owners express concern about vaccine risks. Meanwhile, preventable diseases continue to pose a documented threat. For example, a two-year pause in dog rabies vaccination campaigns in Haiti resulted in a five to eightfold increase in animal rabies cases within a single year, creating a public health crisis that required an emergency response. This event illustrates a central fact: the dangers of vaccine-preventable diseases are quantifiably greater than the known risks associated with vaccination. This article will address concerns about vaccine safety by examining the precise nature of both vaccine risks and disease threats, using verifiable data to support informed decision-making for your dog's health. The Biological Impossibility of Canine Autism The claim that vaccines cause autism in dogs is not supported by veterinary science due to fundamental biological reasons. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a human neurodevelopmental condition. Its diagnosis depends on asses...

5 Must-Ask Questions Before You Leave Your Dog at the Groomer

A 2022 study in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior noted that over 50% of dogs show signs of stress during grooming. While severe physical injuries are less common, a single preventable incident is one too many. Cases like those in Louisiana, where dogs received ocular chemical burns from misused shampoo at a licensed facility, demonstrate that a groomer’s marketing claims are not a guarantee of safety. Your dog’s well-being depends on the protocols you cannot see. The only way to evaluate them is to ask direct, specific questions. The goal is not to create conflict, but to identify competence and build trust based on transparent practices. 1. “What is your exact step-by-step protocol for protecting my dog’s eyes during the bath?” The difference between a safe groom and a dangerous one lies in the specifics of execution. Indicator of a Professional “Before the bath, we apply a sterile, vet-approved ophthalmic ointment to lubricate the eyes and create a barrier against shampoo. We av...

The Practical Path to a Pet-Friendly Rental: A Data-Backed Guide

“I would have lived in a tent before I surrendered my dog ,” says Valerie Ducharme, a renter who faced the Yukon's housing crisis with her Australian shepherd. Her sentiment is common. According to a 2023 Canadian Rental Housing Index report , nearly 40% of rental households include pets, yet a systematic analysis of listings in major Canadian markets shows that less than 30% explicitly welcome them. This gap creates a logistical and emotional crisis for responsible pet owners . This guide provides a concrete strategy based on documented landlord concerns and successful tenant approaches. It replaces hope with a structured plan. 1. Reframe the Conversation from Problem to Solution Landlords decline pets based on rational risk assessment. The documented primary concerns are: Property damage (chewed moldings, stained carpets) Noise disturbances leading to tenant turnover Liability issues (dog bites) Residual allergens affecting future tenants Your application must address these poin...