Skip to main content

BBC Defends ‘Pooch Perfect’ After Viewers Criticized The Show For ‘Setting Bad Example To Pet Owners’

Pooch perfect

The BBC has defended its show Pooch Perfect after viewers accused the broadcaster of setting bad example to pet owners.

The competition to find Britain’s best dog groomer, hosted by Sheridan Smith, features dogs with makeovers.

Some grooms – including those which saw dogs wearing costumes and having their hair dyed – came under fire from viewers.

And the BBC has confirmed it received complaints from some people who claimed “the premise of the programme sets a bad example to pet owners.”

However, the corporation said no dog was harmed and that producers had consulted with both the RSPCA and the British Veterinary Association (BVA).

The BBC said in a statement that “grooming is a healthy and necessary part of responsible dog ownership particularly with certain breeds.”

It went on: “During the production process, the producers consulted with both the RSPCA and British Veterinary Association (BVA) to ensure best practise as regards animal welfare.

“Both organisations were given details of the proposed grooming challenges and both were happy to recommend individuals who then became part of the production team.”

The statement said all of the challenges on Pooch Perfect were “designed to highlight the skills and knowledge of the professional groomers taking part in the show.”

“At no point did the animal welfare team feel there was any risk to the dogs' welfare and all the dogs were monitored throughout to ensure they were happy, did not show signs of stress, that they had sufficient food and water and had adequate rest away from the studio environment,” the statement said.

Addressing the use of hair colour, the statement said: “Any use of colour was strictly controlled and only used to highlight the groom and any use of colour was explained and contextualised for each groom.”

“All colour was temporary, animal safe and washed out almost immediately depending on the dog’s coat.”

The BBC said any outfits were “dog friendly” and were checked by the animal welfare team, as were any accessories used.

It was also noted that owners were given the option to have their dogs regroomed the following day, and that after the series had been filmed the owners reported that their dogs were “happy and healthy, had enjoyed the process and had not suffered any ill effects.”

The BBC also said the series made it clear that the contestants were professional dog groomers and that their techniques should not be tried at home.

“Every precaution was taken throughout filming to ensure each individual dog’s welfare and the production team firmly believes every dog was well treated and that no dog was harmed physically or mentally by the process,” the statement concluded.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Risks: Weighing Vaccine Side Effects vs. Deadly Diseases

Some dog owners express concern about vaccine risks. Meanwhile, preventable diseases continue to pose a documented threat. For example, a two-year pause in dog rabies vaccination campaigns in Haiti resulted in a five to eightfold increase in animal rabies cases within a single year, creating a public health crisis that required an emergency response. This event illustrates a central fact: the dangers of vaccine-preventable diseases are quantifiably greater than the known risks associated with vaccination. This article will address concerns about vaccine safety by examining the precise nature of both vaccine risks and disease threats, using verifiable data to support informed decision-making for your dog's health. The Biological Impossibility of Canine Autism The claim that vaccines cause autism in dogs is not supported by veterinary science due to fundamental biological reasons. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a human neurodevelopmental condition. Its diagnosis depends on asses...

5 Must-Ask Questions Before You Leave Your Dog at the Groomer

A 2022 study in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior noted that over 50% of dogs show signs of stress during grooming. While severe physical injuries are less common, a single preventable incident is one too many. Cases like those in Louisiana, where dogs received ocular chemical burns from misused shampoo at a licensed facility, demonstrate that a groomer’s marketing claims are not a guarantee of safety. Your dog’s well-being depends on the protocols you cannot see. The only way to evaluate them is to ask direct, specific questions. The goal is not to create conflict, but to identify competence and build trust based on transparent practices. 1. “What is your exact step-by-step protocol for protecting my dog’s eyes during the bath?” The difference between a safe groom and a dangerous one lies in the specifics of execution. Indicator of a Professional “Before the bath, we apply a sterile, vet-approved ophthalmic ointment to lubricate the eyes and create a barrier against shampoo. We av...

The Practical Path to a Pet-Friendly Rental: A Data-Backed Guide

“I would have lived in a tent before I surrendered my dog ,” says Valerie Ducharme, a renter who faced the Yukon's housing crisis with her Australian shepherd. Her sentiment is common. According to a 2023 Canadian Rental Housing Index report , nearly 40% of rental households include pets, yet a systematic analysis of listings in major Canadian markets shows that less than 30% explicitly welcome them. This gap creates a logistical and emotional crisis for responsible pet owners . This guide provides a concrete strategy based on documented landlord concerns and successful tenant approaches. It replaces hope with a structured plan. 1. Reframe the Conversation from Problem to Solution Landlords decline pets based on rational risk assessment. The documented primary concerns are: Property damage (chewed moldings, stained carpets) Noise disturbances leading to tenant turnover Liability issues (dog bites) Residual allergens affecting future tenants Your application must address these poin...